Consequences of poor fact-checking

[sadiksojib35]

What to remember :

Try to find information from the original source. If it is in a foreign language, use services with a more accurate translation or ask for help.
Take data only from open authoritative sources. Find out what others say and write about this fact.
Always analyze your findings for logic, subjectivity, manipulation, and distortion of reality.
Do not include information in your content that you cannot confirm or that is taken out of context with the circumstances.
Double-check all numbers, dates, titles, names, quotes and statements.
Ask an expert for his opinion in the field you are writing about.
On Topic: How to Write a Quality Resume Without Paying a Ruble



Deliberate or arbitrary falsification of data results belgium whatsapp phone number in not only reputational risks. There is nothing more illustrative than a real example. One of the most memorable was the release of an article about the connection between vaccinations and autism.

In 1998, The Lancet published a scientific report by Dr. Andrew Wakefield. He claimed that the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine causes autism in children.

The article caused a public outcry and led to a decline in vaccination rates, which led to outbreaks of previously controlled diseases.

However, independent investigations have shown that the research methodology is flawed. The sample consisted of only 12 children, which is clearly insufficient for scientific conclusions of this scale.

It turned out that Wakefield had a financial interest in advancing his hypothesis. He worked with lawyers who were preparing lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers.

Following an investigation, the journal retracted the material and the doctor's medical license was revoked.

Fact-checking showed that the drug-autism claim was false, based on misinformation and faulty scientific methods. This story highlights the importance of accurate fact-checking, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like public health.