Transparent research. Open-source AI development not only drives innovation and democratizes access, but it also has many safety benefits, from spotting security flaws and dangerous lines of development to creating defenses against potential abuse. Big Tech so far supports open-source efforts, but that could change if competition intensifies. There might be a need for legislative measures to retain open-source access.
Contain experimentation. AI need to be sandboxed, with safety and netherlands whatsapp number data security procedures strictly enforced. These aren’t foolproof measures but might make the difference between a local disturbance and a global catastrophe.
Kill switches. Like antidotes and vaccines, countermeasures against runaway or destructive AI variants need to be an integral part of the development process. Even ransomware creators build in a kill switch.
Regulate how it’s used. AI is a technology that can be applied for the good of humanity or abused with disastrous consequences. Regulation of its applications is a task for world governments, and the urgency is much higher than the need to censor the next version of ChatGPT. The EU AI Act is a well-put, concise foundation aimed at preventing misuse without stifling innovation. The U.S. AI Bill of Rights and the recent Executive Order on AI are less specific and seem to focus more on political correctness than on the issues of proper model development, training, and containment. Those measures are just a start, however.