One of the biggest mistakes that many researchers make is that they present reports in the same order as their questions and do not see the potential of storytelling. This is clearly wrong since a correctly designed survey provides a narrative thread for the respondent, going from one question to another maintaining a certain order, changing the subject very rarely.
Remember that your survey should be designed for the respondent, not for your data analysis .
After several revisions, your survey structure may look great, but you should always keep in mind that it was designed to improve the experience of respondents. However, this does not mean that it can dictate the correct order in which the material should be analyzed and how to present the results. When presenting the results of your survey, you should focus on: where you want to go and do not assume that the structure of the survey is the best way to do the analysis.
For better reporting and data analysis, use Storytelling
Tip 1: Create a storytelling: reorder the questions in such a way that the story is told better
To make good reports, top analysts give this advice: follow the inverted pyramid nepal phone number style to present results, answering the essential business questions that prompted the research at the beginning.
Start with your conclusions and give them reasons, rather than piling up evidence. After this you can give details to readers who have the time and interest.
Think about the 3 types of interests of your readers while writing your report:
Type 1: wants a summary of the study.
Type 2: Wants the conclusions with supporting details.
Type 3: Wants the details of the entire body of the investigation.
You want everyone who is interested in your research to be able to take something away from your report so that it is relevant to their work. If you do this, it won't matter whether the person using your research is a senior manager or an analyst, as there will always be something relevant to each of them in your report.
Write your report as if the reader isn't going to read it all. Journalists in the 19th century wrote long, vague news stories where you had to read a lot to get to the story they were actually reporting.
The professionalization of journalism 110 years ago stimulated the development of storytelling using the inverted pyramid style of reporting, where there is a summary of the most important news followed by additional details.