The purpose should not be to discover what was done wrong

[mahbubamim077]

The final report may eventually indicate illicit acts or evidence of illicit acts and, therefore, recommend more accurate and specialized investigations. The Judiciary, therefore, would have an extremely useful and productive delimitation: the definition of what is regular and what may not be, that is, not only the doubtful points indicated by the auditor, but also any objections that the parties may make to his conclusions.

Demand would become smaller, but more specific; instruction would be restricted. There is another relevant point: more than attesting to regularity and dispelling doubts about asset management, it is possible to philippines sms gateway simultaneously assess assets to guide distribution. Undoing this would be a loss and money cannot be ignored . They have been divorced for a long time and are still very rich. Some readers even know who we are talking about. There are not that many rich people out there. The divorce and division of assets were well planned and executed. They still have some investments in common. The marriage fell apart, but the assets did not. There was no need for it, right?

One last observation: in consensual separation processes, there is nothing to prevent the hiring of experts to carry out a verification and assessment of the assets, which can be amicably agreed upon between the parties, signing an agreement that regulates it in detail. It may seem crazy, but it is not. If the dissolution of the emotional bond does not entail disputes, even regarding assets, the intervention of experts allows not only to define the overall amount to be shared, but also the model or models that can be used, allowing adherence to the one that is most advantageous for those involved directly (those who are separating) or indirectly, such as family members, controlled companies, etc.