What kind of parsing is prohibited by law?
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 3:52 am
A parser is a program that searches for and analyzes freely available content on the Internet. Accordingly, such activity is not prohibited by law. The exception is personal data of a person that can identify him. Parsing is allowed only on depersonalized data, or you need to obtain the consent of the information manager - the owner of the site on which the user is registered. As for information that is not personal, it can be considered confidential only if this is indicated. Thus, some resources have a section "Privacy Policy".
Besides,according to the Law of Ukraine "On finland telegram number database Copyright and Related Rights"Possible copyright infringement should be taken into account. Only the person who created the material determines how it can be used.
Owners of web resources love to add other people's content to their pages (from product cards to longread reviews). Although, this method of filling sites is only harmful. Google always prefers the original source. Even if the content is completely copied, the system's algorithms quickly recognize plagiarism. As a result, the positions of a site with non-unique information can significantly "sag" in the search results, or even get banned (the pages will stop being indexed by the search engine).
intentional damage to the site (for example, DDOS attacks);
search for personal data of users that is not freely available;
posting someone else's content on your own behalf (articles, photos, videos);
collection and/or dissemination of information that is a commercial or state secret.
Is web scraping legal?
Besides,according to the Law of Ukraine "On finland telegram number database Copyright and Related Rights"Possible copyright infringement should be taken into account. Only the person who created the material determines how it can be used.
Owners of web resources love to add other people's content to their pages (from product cards to longread reviews). Although, this method of filling sites is only harmful. Google always prefers the original source. Even if the content is completely copied, the system's algorithms quickly recognize plagiarism. As a result, the positions of a site with non-unique information can significantly "sag" in the search results, or even get banned (the pages will stop being indexed by the search engine).
intentional damage to the site (for example, DDOS attacks);
search for personal data of users that is not freely available;
posting someone else's content on your own behalf (articles, photos, videos);
collection and/or dissemination of information that is a commercial or state secret.
Is web scraping legal?