Gemini useful for anything?
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 3:57 am
The responses to the quickly disappeared survey, greece phone number however, give us only part of the story. They give us the part of the story of those people who should benefit from using AI systems to speed up their work and then focus on other things.
But what do they think inside Google about services and suggestions, such as getting advice from an LLM on SEO? In this regard, and to understand even more some of the comments, it is good to remember that time when John Mueller himself advised a reddit user against letting an LLM give him advice on SEO by writing " Please do not use LLMs for SEO advice. They learn from all the wrong information out there ."
That would be enough to close the matter.
But, and it happens with everything, in reality you can't close the matter so bluntly. Because even if the LLMs aren't capable of doing many things , they can still do something. What many people don't understand, especially those who are a little fooled by the promise of having everything at their fingertips without paying, is that the tools are actually useful only to those who know what happens under the hood.
It's a bit like the difference between wanting to assemble a car by following only a YouTube tutorial without ever having changed a flat tire and instead watching a mechanic with twenty years of experience who performs the same operations. Maybe chatting amiably with the same YouTube tutorial, but also knowing how to weigh the advice given to him.
Bringing the discussion to SEO, let's try to see what can be done with content writing. If you have a small business and want to save money , the idea of asking an artificial intelligence to produce 10, 20, 100 articles or content of various types to reach your potential audience may seem like the idea of the century. But if you don't write for a living, it is not possible, for example, to ensure that the text actually responds to what is expected in terms of grammar and content.
But what do they think inside Google about services and suggestions, such as getting advice from an LLM on SEO? In this regard, and to understand even more some of the comments, it is good to remember that time when John Mueller himself advised a reddit user against letting an LLM give him advice on SEO by writing " Please do not use LLMs for SEO advice. They learn from all the wrong information out there ."
That would be enough to close the matter.
But, and it happens with everything, in reality you can't close the matter so bluntly. Because even if the LLMs aren't capable of doing many things , they can still do something. What many people don't understand, especially those who are a little fooled by the promise of having everything at their fingertips without paying, is that the tools are actually useful only to those who know what happens under the hood.
It's a bit like the difference between wanting to assemble a car by following only a YouTube tutorial without ever having changed a flat tire and instead watching a mechanic with twenty years of experience who performs the same operations. Maybe chatting amiably with the same YouTube tutorial, but also knowing how to weigh the advice given to him.
Bringing the discussion to SEO, let's try to see what can be done with content writing. If you have a small business and want to save money , the idea of asking an artificial intelligence to produce 10, 20, 100 articles or content of various types to reach your potential audience may seem like the idea of the century. But if you don't write for a living, it is not possible, for example, to ensure that the text actually responds to what is expected in terms of grammar and content.