The Five Safes framework was
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:29 am
However, the condition for doing this was that best practice safeguarding should be adopted universally to support public confidence in sharing their data. described to participants as an example of how safe-guarding can happen through every stage of the researcher journey; we heard strong endorsement of this approach.
Participants also felt strongly that the missed use of data and missing data were harmful to evidence-based decision-making for research and policymaking aimed at better understanding spain rcs data society. Despite a minority of participants suggesting they had a sense of fatigue related to disclosing data to public services, thinking data about them was constantly being collected, there was still a feeling that more data and better use of existing data could be used to improve the quality of life for everyone in society. Where there was hesitancy around sharing personal data, it seemed to concern specific types of data related to identity, e.g., sexuality or religion. However, the origin of this hesitancy was related to a lack of explanation as to why the data was being collected.
This relates to another finding we had; ‘Clear Communication’. Participants felt that hearing more about public good outcomes from data used for research and statistics would strengthen public support for data sharing. Perhaps there are opportunities for good news stories that we should be prioritising. The use of data for research and statistics has contributed to a wealth of insights that can and have improved peoples’ lives, and the public wants to hear about it.
Participants also felt strongly that the missed use of data and missing data were harmful to evidence-based decision-making for research and policymaking aimed at better understanding spain rcs data society. Despite a minority of participants suggesting they had a sense of fatigue related to disclosing data to public services, thinking data about them was constantly being collected, there was still a feeling that more data and better use of existing data could be used to improve the quality of life for everyone in society. Where there was hesitancy around sharing personal data, it seemed to concern specific types of data related to identity, e.g., sexuality or religion. However, the origin of this hesitancy was related to a lack of explanation as to why the data was being collected.
This relates to another finding we had; ‘Clear Communication’. Participants felt that hearing more about public good outcomes from data used for research and statistics would strengthen public support for data sharing. Perhaps there are opportunities for good news stories that we should be prioritising. The use of data for research and statistics has contributed to a wealth of insights that can and have improved peoples’ lives, and the public wants to hear about it.