The index contains the URL.

[kexej28769@nongnue]

Size matters.
It does. Let’s face it. The small size of the Mozscape index has been a limitation for years. Maybe someday we’ll write a long post about all the efforts Moz has made to grow the index and what problems got in our way, but that’s a post for a different day. The truth is that as much as quality matters, size is too big for many specific use cases of a link bahrain number data . Do you want to find all your bad links? Bigger is better. Do you want to find lots of link opportunities? Bigger is better. So we came up with a number of metrics to help us determine where we stand relative to our competitors. Here are our metrics for each size.


What is the probability of a randomly selected URL being in our index versus a competitor?


This is one of my favorite metrics because I think it’s a pure reflection of index size. It answers the simple question “If we grabbed a random URL on the web, what are the chances that an indexer would know about it?” However, you can see my learning curve in the graph (I was reporting the wrong thing to the Ahrefs API due to an error on my part) but once it was correct, we had a good representation of the indexes. Let me rephrase that – these are comparisons in APIs, not in the web tools themselves. If I remember correctly, for example, you can get more data from running reports in Majestic. However, I think it shows that Moz’s new Link Explorer is a strong contender, if not the biggest, as we’ve led in this category every day except one. As of this writing, Moz is winning.


The domain is in the index.
What is the probability of a randomly selected domain being in our index vs. a competitor?