Let's try to find an equivalent of the offer

[sumaiyakhatun26]

That Piano offers in real life. Imagine that you want to buy a magazine for guitarists. Unfortunately, you can't buy it unless you also buy two other monthlies - "Virtuoza Pianina" (which, if you're in a pinch, might interest you) and... "Młody Technik". Why do you need "Młody Technik" if you've only had a screwdriver in your hand once in your life and almost gouged your eye out with it?!

It would be half the trouble if these articles gave the reader unique value. Then I would feel that although I do not benefit myself, I pay professionals for a job well done. Meanwhile, continuing the analogy, most of the issue is filled with texts such germany rcs data as "Which side to hold a screwdriver", "5 types of screws you have to buy at a hardware store" and "How much does it cost to renovate an apartment?", the conclusion of which is that it depends on a million factors.

I want to buy access to a single article. I don't want to pay for content that doesn't interest me in any way. I don't want to pay for content that is, in the vast majority of cases, embarrassingly bad. Until publishers understand this and stop distorting reality forcibly, they won't get a penny from me.